Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Family Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckstein, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relationships as a "Three-Legged Sack Race"

Daniel Eckstein

Ottawa University, deckstein{at}juno.com

Marilyn Leventhal

Ottawa University

Sherry Bentley

Ottawa University

Sharon A. Kelley

Ottawa University

The authors introduce the "three-legged sack race" as a metaphor for three contrasting ways of describing a couple’s relationship. The interdependent model has the inside two legs of the couple attached and the outside two legs independent. Enmeshed, or overly dependent couples have all four legs in the sack (no individuation). Conversely, independent couples have all four legs out of the sack (detached). After having an individual self-assess his or her behaviors characterizing each of these styles, the authors present some sample responses based on interviews with 55 adults. Attachment theory is then discussed. The article concludes with implications and applications to one’s own relationship and identifying a "next-steps action plan."

The Family Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, 399-405 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1066480799074014


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
T. Duffey, C. Somody, and D. Eckstein
Musical Relationship Metaphors: Using A Musical Chronology and the Emerging Life Song With Couples
The Family Journal, April 1, 2009; 17(2): 151 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
D. Eckstein, F. Clemmer, and A. Fierro
The Use of Image Exchange in Examining Relationship Role Perceptions
The Family Journal, January 1, 2006; 14(1): 71 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Family JournalHome page
D. Eckstein
The "A's and H's" of Healthy and Unhealthy Relationships: Three Relationship Renewal Activities
The Family Journal, October 1, 2004; 12(4): 414 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]